This time, the Indians fail to hold on to the territory they have just won in Bactria. The old Persian state still has some life left in it yet as their forces retake the province yet again. Bactria has probably become the most common scene of battles in the campaign. Deployment map:
The Indians are at the top of the map. Although constrained by a stream, the terrain is relatively open, with only one low hill in front of the invading army's right. Plan of the action:
And here is Gordon's description of the battle:
"Persians
retake rebel province from Indians
In the
latest round of the campaign the rump of the once mighty Achaemenid empire, now
fighting as Bactrian Greek, turned eastwards to try and recapture a rebellious
province now occupied by the Indians.
The Bactro/Persians
deployed from the left, a front line of
peltasts with a unit of medium cavalry and two units of elephants in the second
line. Then came a small phalanx unit and a companions unit with a further
companion unit in reserve. Four further phalanx units filled the left centre
and a unit of medium cavalry provided a flank guard. Then there was a sizeable
gap. Detached on the right was a single phalanx, four horse archer units and
skirmishers.
The
Indians deployed in a shallow formation with infantry in the centre
interspersed with elephants. The intention was to maximise firepower and give
opportunities to exploit the narrower frontage of the Bactro/Persians. Cavalry and chariots faced the Bactro/Persian
left and infantry with cavalry in reserve the right. Surprisingly they had no
skirmishers.
The
Bactrian plan was to push up on the left, the phalanx in echelon with the right
somewhat refused. The elephants would come round the flank of the Indian
infantry once engaged by the phalanx. It was expected that the Indians would
try to come in on the open flank of the phalanx. As a counter to this it was
hoped that the horse archers would be able, using the stream on the right flank
as cover, be able to shoot up the Indian cavlry and then pass over the stream
and tie up the flanking forces.
Is this
what happened? Of course not. The battle on the Bactro/Persian left was fairly
even. The peltasts mostly died but did enough damage to allow the second line
to come into action. However at this point the left most Indian infantry unit
engaged by a phalanx and companions failed its morale on seeing a chariot unit
break. In Tactica this does not mean an immediate rout but such failures are
usually disastrous. So it proved. The phalanx and the companions flattened it
and the next unit then failed its morale and was routed by the phalanx and so
did the next unit and was routed and so did the elephants although they did not
rout.
The
Indians meantime had developed their attackon the right flankof the phalanx.
One unit of elephants was drawn off by the cavalry flank guard but an Indian
infantry unit was able to attack the end phalanx advantageously and rolled over
it in a single turn by virtue of prodigious dice throwing.
On the
right despite masses of firepower virtually no damage was done to Indian
cavalry (they might as well have used rubber arrows) and the Indian infantry
got in about the single Phalanx Unit which was looking a bit poorly.
By this
time the disasters on the left had brought the Indian army very close to
breaking and a sudden effective round of shooting finally finished of the
Indian cavalry. The victorious phalanx routed the elephants and it was all
over.
It cannot
be emphasised how badly the Indians were let down by their dice on the morale
throws. It turned what was looking like a well balanced and interesting game
into a total disaster.
The other
Paul took some photos so these may be forthcoming in due course."
Despite some local success against part of the phalanx, then, the Indian army was routed as a consequence of a disastrous morale cascade. Next up in the campaign is a Macedonian attack on the Ptolemaic forces in Syria, probably in a few weeks' time.